Just-in-Time Ontologies: What Cheap Intelligence Means for Data — Hrishi Olickel, Southbridge AI
This talk addresses the limitations of universal schemas and confident agents in data transformation for AI. It proposes a 'just-in-time ontology' approach where transformations are built when a specific question is known, preserving context and evidence. The talk uses an Ohio campaign finance entity resolution project as an example, detailing the separation of models for pipeline design, job execution, and system optimization. Key elements discussed include the importance of definitions, held-out cases, disagreement checks, and model priors. It also outlines four requirements for self-optimizing pipelines: stable execution surfaces, bounded budgets, reusable methods, and defined failure modes, advocating for small pilots and independently checked work segments to manage cost, speed, and accuracy trade-offs while maintaining evidence.
More from the Agentic Workflows trail
- The Agent Works. Does Anyone Trust It? — Michele Grant, Leading at Scale
- Deploying AI Inside a Bank Is Not an Engineering Problem — Paden Gayle, Applied AI Engineers
- Agents in Orbit: Workflows, Not Autopilot — Eduardo Simon & Javier Casal, Flywire
- Reliable, Smart Workflows for Finance, Wealth and Insurance — Karthic Rao, Perpetual
- Please… Enough with the Sloppy, One-Shot SaaS Replacements — Mahmoud Abdelwahab, Railway