Why AI Agents like OpenClaw Burn Through Tokens and How to Cut Costs
Feb 28, 2026Min Yin

Summary
This post details how AI agents, specifically OpenClaw, can burn through tokens due to inefficient search and memory management. It proposes solutions by introducing hybrid search (combining BM25 and vector search) and persistent, editable memory. For hybrid search, it highlights index1 (single-machine, SQLite-based), QMD (single-machine, LLM re-ranking), and Milvus (distributed, team/enterprise scale) as options. For memory, it discusses the need for inspectable and controllable storage beyond framework-dependent solutions.
More from the AI Data Storage Engine trail
- Milvus Snapshots: Point-in-Time Collection Views Without Copying Data
- Announcing Milvus 3.0: Lake-Native Vector Search and a More Powerful Retrieval Engine
- How to Recover Milvus Data After etcd Corruption Without a Backup
- Open Tag: An Open-Source Claude Tag for Claude Code and Codex
- How Force Merge Compaction Nearly Doubled Milvus Search QPS