Encouragement Designs and Instrumental Variables for A/B Testing
Aug 1, 2023Benjamin Elbers, Data Scientist
Summary
This post introduces and details the application of encouragement designs and instrumental variables (IV) estimators within Spotify's A/B testing framework. It explains the theoretical underpinnings of these methods, contrasting them with standard A/B tests and tests with one-sided noncompliance. The post elaborates on the four user groups (always-takers, compliers, never-takers, defiers) and how they factor into the IV estimator for calculating the Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) or Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE). This extends the platform's capabilities to measure feature impact in more challenging experimental setups.
More from the Experimentation Platform trail
- Why Spotify Is Not Using Bayesian A/B Testing | Spotify Engineering
- When Can LLMs Replace Humans in A/B Tests? | Spotify Engineering
- Better Experiments with LLM Evals — A funnel, not a fork | Spotify Engineering
- Why We Use Separate Tech Stacks for Personalization and Experimentation
- Beyond Winning: Spotify’s Experiments with Learning Framework